Debate:Should the Government spy on their Citizen’s
People in the United States should have the freedom and privacy they need. The government should spy on their own citizen. The government spying on citizens makes many people feel insecure, and would be angry with the government, because they should be able to trust them with their own dealings. Even if it could save a life, we cannot always prevent it from happening, so doing so betraying the citizen's would also be breaking the 4th amendment. The governmental officials need to require a search warrant included to come into any house. Giving government the power to look over everything can be abused horribly. People have a right not to be watched at all hours of the day. I understand that spying on everybody will more efficiently catch the criminal but everybody makes mistakes. You never know when you are going to be the one that is being charged for that one accidental mistake.
Rebuttal
There is a line between spying on citizens to find out who is a terrorist and putting tabs on non-suspicious people, so the government should not be able to do that. Also, we do not know what kind of information they have on us and that is not constitutional. As humans, we have the right to have our secrets and at the same time we have the right to keep certain things private. The government has no right to disobey on these rights. Spying on us is another form of control. The only time the government should spy on us is if they think someone is a threat to the nation and people around. Yes, it’s possible to be safer though do we really want to live in a police state; that is what it would become. Yes, if there is proper because it’s perfectly fine, but let’s think of this rationally; would you really like the idea of being watched 24/7. Some of you would like the idea for a period of time but after a while you'll get irritated because no one likes being watch everyday.
People in the United States should have the freedom and privacy they need. The government should spy on their own citizen. The government spying on citizens makes many people feel insecure, and would be angry with the government, because they should be able to trust them with their own dealings. Even if it could save a life, we cannot always prevent it from happening, so doing so betraying the citizen's would also be breaking the 4th amendment. The governmental officials need to require a search warrant included to come into any house. Giving government the power to look over everything can be abused horribly. People have a right not to be watched at all hours of the day. I understand that spying on everybody will more efficiently catch the criminal but everybody makes mistakes. You never know when you are going to be the one that is being charged for that one accidental mistake.
Rebuttal
There is a line between spying on citizens to find out who is a terrorist and putting tabs on non-suspicious people, so the government should not be able to do that. Also, we do not know what kind of information they have on us and that is not constitutional. As humans, we have the right to have our secrets and at the same time we have the right to keep certain things private. The government has no right to disobey on these rights. Spying on us is another form of control. The only time the government should spy on us is if they think someone is a threat to the nation and people around. Yes, it’s possible to be safer though do we really want to live in a police state; that is what it would become. Yes, if there is proper because it’s perfectly fine, but let’s think of this rationally; would you really like the idea of being watched 24/7. Some of you would like the idea for a period of time but after a while you'll get irritated because no one likes being watch everyday.
Debate: Should the school provided condoms
Schools are funded to educate and facilitate children to produce for society in the future, not encourage them to be irresponsible and have sex. They should push good decisions and making something out of them self. They are just going to think that by getting free condoms the school is encouraging them to have sex .That's not really smart for the schools to do. I think they shouldn't give free condoms at school. It's not right. Some parents wouldn't like there kids coming home with condoms. School isn't a pharmacy or a store they are there to teach kids to be ready for life and to teach them and yes they should know about sex I'm not saying that but buy giving them condoms are doing extra we already have health and safety what more do they want. kids all they think about is having sex and if the school provide them then they will think it’s okay to have sex at a young age. Also condoms aren't so safe because there are kids and adults that uses condoms and still get pregnant.
Rebuttal
Yea they will have safe sex but that something the school should be involved because that will tell the teenagers thats it’s okay to have sex. The condom is not always safe its 99% safety, we still have kids that used condoms and still come out pregnant. There are a lot of teenagers getting pregnant and are to young to rase a kid so they get abortion witch is not right killing a innocent. Let them have sex they can do anything they want outside of school because if the school is involved parents are going to blame the school for teens getting pregnant at a young age. If teens are too embarrassed to get them, then they are too immature for sex. Not only that, but it is not the school's responsibility to give it to the teenagers. It's the teenager's responsibility to go get condom if they are taking the responsibility to have safe sex. It's a personal choice that does not involve the school. Kids are going to get the wrong message . They're going to think that having sex at a young age is a good thing to do. You wan a have sex ask your parents or go buy them your self school is to learn.
Schools are funded to educate and facilitate children to produce for society in the future, not encourage them to be irresponsible and have sex. They should push good decisions and making something out of them self. They are just going to think that by getting free condoms the school is encouraging them to have sex .That's not really smart for the schools to do. I think they shouldn't give free condoms at school. It's not right. Some parents wouldn't like there kids coming home with condoms. School isn't a pharmacy or a store they are there to teach kids to be ready for life and to teach them and yes they should know about sex I'm not saying that but buy giving them condoms are doing extra we already have health and safety what more do they want. kids all they think about is having sex and if the school provide them then they will think it’s okay to have sex at a young age. Also condoms aren't so safe because there are kids and adults that uses condoms and still get pregnant.
Rebuttal
Yea they will have safe sex but that something the school should be involved because that will tell the teenagers thats it’s okay to have sex. The condom is not always safe its 99% safety, we still have kids that used condoms and still come out pregnant. There are a lot of teenagers getting pregnant and are to young to rase a kid so they get abortion witch is not right killing a innocent. Let them have sex they can do anything they want outside of school because if the school is involved parents are going to blame the school for teens getting pregnant at a young age. If teens are too embarrassed to get them, then they are too immature for sex. Not only that, but it is not the school's responsibility to give it to the teenagers. It's the teenager's responsibility to go get condom if they are taking the responsibility to have safe sex. It's a personal choice that does not involve the school. Kids are going to get the wrong message . They're going to think that having sex at a young age is a good thing to do. You wan a have sex ask your parents or go buy them your self school is to learn.